SolisReach
← Journal
SEO & AEO6 min read

Link building that doesn't feel spammy, and mostly still works

Written by the SolisReach team

Link building has a bad reputation partly because a lot of what used to be standard practice, directory submissions, paid link networks, guest post farms, has become actively risky as search engines got better at detecting it. What still works looks more like normal business development than a traditional SEO tactic, which is exactly why it still works.

Digital PR tied to something genuinely newsworthy

Original research, a survey of your own customer base, an interesting internal data set turned into a public report, gives journalists and industry sites an actual reason to link to you rather than a favor to ask for. This is slower and requires real content investment, but the links it earns are the kind search engines trust most, and they tend to arrive in clusters once one publication picks the story up.

Finding genuinely broken links on relevant sites and offering your own equivalent, better resource as a replacement is one of the few classic tactics that still works, specifically because it's providing real value to the site owner rather than just asking for a favor. It only works at a small, targeted scale, not as a mass outreach campaign sent to hundreds of sites at once.

Partnerships and supplier relationships you already have

Existing business relationships, suppliers, partners, industry associations, are an underused link source. A simple audit of who you already work with, and whether they'd naturally link to you as a partner or vendor, often surfaces easy, legitimate opportunities nobody thought to ask for, since the relationship already exists and doesn't require cold outreach.

None of the above produces links quickly. We set expectations with clients that a genuine digital PR or partnership-based link campaign is a quarter-over-quarter effort, not a monthly deliverable, since rushing it tends to push teams back toward the exact spammy tactics that carry real penalty risk.

What we actively avoid

Paid link placements, reciprocal link exchanges at scale, and guest posts on sites that exist purely to sell links are all things we steer clients away from, even when they're offered as a shortcut. The downside risk, a manual action penalty that takes months to recover from, isn't worth the short-term ranking gain, and we explain that tradeoff directly whenever a client is tempted by a fast-sounding link package.

Beyond raw link count, we track referring domain diversity and the actual organic traffic and ranking movement for target pages over the following months. A campaign that adds fifty links from ten domains is weaker than one that adds twenty links from twenty different, relevant domains, even though the raw link count favors the former.

A specific example of digital PR paying off unexpectedly

An original data report we built for one client, based entirely on their own aggregated customer data with identities removed, got picked up by three industry publications within a month, generating links the client's competitors, without similar proprietary data to share, simply couldn't replicate on demand.

Why guest posting isn't entirely dead, despite its reputation

Guest posting on genuinely relevant, well-trafficked industry publications, written to be useful to that publication's actual audience rather than stuffed with links, still works. The distinction between this and the guest-post-farm approach that damaged the tactic's reputation is entirely about the quality and relevance of the placement, not the tactic itself.

Guest posting on genuinely relevant, well-trafficked industry publications, written to be useful to that publication's actual audience rather than stuffed with links, still works.

We don't promise a fixed number of links per month, since chasing an arbitrary quota is exactly what pushes teams toward lower-quality tactics. Instead we report on outreach volume, placements actually secured, and the estimated authority and relevance of each one, giving a client an honest picture of both effort and quality rather than a vanity count.

How we vet a publication before pursuing a placement there

Before investing outreach effort in a specific publication, we check its own organic visibility and traffic trends, since a site that looks reputable on the surface but has been penalized or is declining rapidly won't pass much real value through a link, however legitimate the placement itself looks.

What we tell clients who want to buy their way onto a "best of" listicle

Paid listicle placements are common and rarely disclosed as paid, which creates real risk if uncovered, both to search rankings and to brand trust. We steer clients toward earning inclusion through genuine product quality and outreach instead, even though it's a slower path than simply paying for a guaranteed spot.

Digital PR and partnership-based link building compound in a way paid tactics don't, since a strong piece of coverage or a genuine partner relationship can continue generating relevant links and referral traffic years after the original outreach effort. We track this longer compounding value explicitly in annual client reviews, since a purely monthly view of link building activity undersells its real, accumulating long-term contribution.

We also track which specific pieces of content on a client's site are naturally earning links without any active outreach at all, since this organic pattern often reveals what kind of content that audience and industry find genuinely link-worthy in the first place. Doubling down on that proven content format for future digital PR efforts, rather than guessing blindly at what might work, consistently produces a stronger and more predictable return than starting each new campaign's content strategy completely from scratch.

Cleaning up after a manual action penalty starts with a full audit of every existing backlink, categorizing which ones are legitimate and which are clearly part of a paid or manipulative scheme. We prepare a disavow file for the problematic links and submit a reconsideration request with a clear, honest explanation of what was done and what's changed, since search engines respond far better to genuine remediation than to a vague or defensive appeal.

This recovery process is slower and more painful than building good links from scratch would have been, and we make sure clients understand that upfront when they're evaluating whether a cheap, fast-sounding link package from another vendor is actually worth the risk. The math rarely favors the shortcut once the realistic cost of a future cleanup is factored in honestly.

External links get most of the attention, but a page that earns a strong external link still needs solid internal linking to actually pass that authority through to other important pages on the site. We review a target page's internal link profile alongside any external link campaign, since a page sitting at the end of a weak internal link structure won't fully benefit from external authority no matter how many good external links it earns.

Start a project

Want this applied to your site?

We run a Core Web Vitals and SEO audit before quoting any performance marketing engagement, and we're happy to share what we'd find on yours.