SolisReach
← Journal
Working with us5 min read

How we plan client work around holiday freezes on both sides

Written by the SolisReach team

Late November through early January is a genuinely awkward stretch for international client work. Many of our US, Canadian, Australian, and European clients go quiet or explicitly freeze changes around Thanksgiving through New Year, while our own team in New Delhi works a mostly normal schedule through that same period, aside from a handful of Indian holidays that don't line up with Western ones at all.

Why change freezes exist, and why we respect them

Many eCommerce and consumer-facing clients explicitly freeze all non-critical site changes during peak holiday shopping weeks, since even a well-tested deployment carries some risk, and the cost of a bug during peak revenue days far outweighs the benefit of shipping a planned feature a few weeks early. We build these freeze windows into project timelines from the start of any engagement that runs through the holiday season, rather than treating them as a surprise interruption.

What we do with the extra working time

Rather than idling during a client's freeze window, we use it for work that doesn't touch production: internal QA passes, documentation, preparing the next quarter's roadmap, or building and testing features on staging that will deploy immediately once the freeze lifts. Clients often come back from their break to find a fully tested feature ready to ship on day one, rather than work that hasn't started yet.

Indian holidays that don't map to Western calendars

Diwali, which usually falls in October or November, is our team's equivalent of a major holiday period, and it doesn't line up with any Western holiday schedule at all. We flag Diwali dates to every client at the start of an engagement specifically because it's easy for an overseas client to not know it's coming, unlike Christmas or Thanksgiving, which are on every Western calendar by default.

Setting expectations in writing, early

Every project that will run through November through January gets an explicit calendar at kickoff showing both sides' holiday and freeze periods, so nobody's surprised by a slower week they didn't know was coming. This single document has prevented more year-end scheduling friction than any amount of reactive explaining after the fact.

The advantage this awkward overlap actually creates

Used well, the mismatch is an advantage: while a client's own team is largely offline for the holidays, ours isn't, which means genuine progress keeps happening on the project during a period when it would otherwise stall completely at a same-country agency. Clients who understand this upfront tend to plan their most ambitious year-end pushes specifically around this window, not despite it.

What we still need from a client during their freeze

A production freeze isn't the same as a communication freeze, and we're explicit about that distinction at the start of every engagement. Even when a client's team is largely offline, we ask for a single named point of contact who can answer a genuinely blocking question within a day, since the alternative, work stopping entirely because nobody's available to approve a decision, wastes the exact working time the mismatch was supposed to create.

Most clients are happy to name someone for this once it's framed clearly: not a full-time commitment during their break, just a fallback contact for the rare blocking question. In practice we rarely need to use it, since we plan the freeze period's work specifically to avoid needing client decisions, but having the contact named in advance means we're never stuck waiting on someone who's fully checked out with no clear who's covering.

A production freeze isn't the same as a communication freeze, and we're explicit about that distinction at the start of every engagement.

How we schedule the actual handoff back after a freeze lifts

The first week back from a client's holiday break is its own small scheduling challenge, since everyone's simultaneously catching up on email, meetings, and the usual post-vacation backlog. We schedule a specific re-entry call in the first few days back, not the first available slot on the calendar, but a deliberately protected time to walk through everything built during the freeze and agree on what ships first. Without that structure, a genuinely productive freeze period can sit unreviewed for two or three weeks simply because nobody carved out the time to look at it.

Retainer clients versus project clients during this window

The calendar mismatch plays out differently depending on the engagement type. A retainer client paying for a fixed monthly capacity benefits directly from the extra working time, since that capacity gets used productively regardless of which side of the world is on holiday, and we make sure to document exactly what got built during a freeze so the retainer hours are visibly accounted for even though the client wasn't actively reviewing progress in real time.

A project client on a fixed deadline needs a different conversation: whether the holiday freeze period is inside or outside the committed timeline, and whether our team working through it actually changes the delivery date, or just the sequencing of what gets built when. We're explicit about this distinction at the proposal stage for any project spanning November through January, since assuming it works the same way as a retainer leads to mismatched expectations about what a holiday freeze actually costs the timeline.

A specific example from a recent engagement

One eCommerce client froze all site changes from the week before Thanksgiving through the first week of January, a common pattern for retail businesses protecting peak revenue days. During that six-week window, our team built and fully tested three features on staging: an updated checkout flow, a loyalty points display, and a redesigned product filter. All three shipped within the first four days after the freeze lifted, since they'd already been through a full QA cycle and just needed final client sign-off rather than starting development from scratch.

The client's own estimate was that this saved roughly three to four weeks compared to starting the same work after their team came back online, purely because the six-week freeze window would otherwise have been dead time on the project rather than productive time spent building and testing.

Why we still flag risk even during productive freeze work

Building on staging during a freeze isn't risk-free just because it never touches production. We still keep the client's designated contact briefed on major decisions made during that period, even if they're not actively reviewing daily, since a feature built entirely without any check-in for six weeks risks drifting from what the client actually wanted by the time it's ready to ship. A short async update midway through the freeze, not requiring a response, just visibility, keeps this risk low without asking anyone to break their actual holiday.

Start a project

Want this applied to your site?

We run a Core Web Vitals and SEO audit before quoting any performance marketing engagement, and we're happy to share what we'd find on yours.